The U.S. and Pakistan have enjoyed an on-again, off-again relationship for years. Ambassadors Howard Schaffer and Teresita Schaffer describe the relationship in their latest USIP Press book “How Pakistan Negotiates with the United States: Riding the Roller Coaster.”

April 13, 2011

U.S.-PAKISTANI RELATIONS: A WORK IN PROGRESS – The U.S. and Pakistan have enjoyed an on-again, off-again relationship for years, a “roller coaster” if you ask former Ambassadors Howard Schaffer and Teresita Schaffer who launched their new book “How Pakistan Negotiates with the United States: Riding the Roller Coaster” at USIP April 12. Volatility describes the relationship: Howard Schaffer said that an alternative to their book’s subtitle was “Three Marriages and Two Divorces.” 

HIGHS AND LOWS – Indeed, over the past 60 years, Pakistan-U.S. relations have been marked by highs of close cooperation and lows of deep bilateral estrangement,” states the USIP invite for the event. “Recent events and negotiations underscore the remarkable resilience but also the vulnerability and volatility of the relationship.”

THAT RELATIONSHIP: IN CRISIS? – The New York Times reports that Pakistan wants the U.S. to reduce significantly the number of CIA operatives and U.S. military Special Forces personnel operating inside Pakistan, and for the CIA to cease drone attacks on militants in northwest Pakistan. “The request was a sign of the near collapse of cooperation between the two testy allies,” wrote the NYT’s Jane Perlez and Ismail Khan April 11. The news makes the Schaffers’ new book all the more relevant – an inside look at how Pakistan negotiates with the U.S. over just this kind of episode.

THE PAKISTANI “GUILT TRIP” – So much of the U.S.-Pakistani negotiating relationship is driven by the emotional and political baggage from both sides over the years. But recognizing, as American officials often do, that the U.S. can be a fair-weather friend, the Pakistanis have become adept at “cultivating the art of the guilt trip,” says Teresita Schaffer. “This happens in large ways and small ways…” From the Schaffers’ book, in a section titled “Who Needs Whom?,” the authors suggest the Pakistanis sometimes overplay the guilt card: “…at key points in U.S.-Pakistan relations, Pakistan has been convinced that the United States needs it more than the reverse. This has a profound impact on the negotiating dynamic,” they write.

CHINA: AN “ALL-WEATHER FRIEND” – The Schaffers discuss in their book the Pakistani-Chinese relationship. “China heads the list of reliable friends, as Pakistani leaders and officials see it, and plays several roles in Pakistan’s approach to negotiating with the United States,” the authors wrote.

HOW TO HAVE A SUSTAINED RELATIONSHIP –“You have to have a sustained engagement to bring about more transparency in the relationship,” USIP’s Moeed Yusuf said after the event. 

THE U.S., PAKISTAN AND A KLEENEX – Howard Schaffer told the group April 12 that a Pakistani once told him that Pakistanis think the U.S. “discards Pakistan like a used Kleenex.”

THE U.S. GOES TO THE MILITARY WELL TOO OFTEN – So says Howard Schaffer, who thinks the U.S. needs to spend more time publicly supporting civilian political leaders in Pakistan and not always see the Pakistani military as the only “can do” arm of the country. He believes that whenever the U.S. needs something, there is “always a tendency… to look to the military.” But that ignores the civilian leadership that, however flawed, can’t be ignored. “It’s important that the United States must do what it can to foster stronger civilian political institutions,” Howard Schaffer says. “We talk a lot about them, but we have to play a better game than we do.”

USIP’s MOEED YUSUF ON TODAY’S CRISIS –Media reports indicate that Pakistan, angry over the incident in which Raymond Davis, reportedly a CIA contractor, shot and killed two men in January whom he thought were robbing him. USIP’s Yusuf thinks the relationship is at another critical point. “I think it’s out of control,” Yusuf says of the relationship. “I think both sides believe they can’t rupture the relationship, so they have to do a lot of damage control to get this back on track.”

FROM “CRISIS TO CRISIS” – There’s hope, despite all the history, that the U.S. is in the relationship for the long-haul and that it can move beyond the “transactional relationship” Pakistan perceives the relationship to be. Still, for now, it seems only to move “from crisis to crisis,” says Yusuf.

Explore Further


Related Publications

Senior Study Group on Counterterrorism in Afghanistan and Pakistan: Final Report

Senior Study Group on Counterterrorism in Afghanistan and Pakistan: Final Report

Tuesday, May 14, 2024

When announcing the US withdrawal from Afghanistan in April 2021, President Joe Biden identified counterterrorism in Afghanistan and Pakistan as an enduring and critical US national security interest. This priority became even more pronounced after the Taliban’s return to power in August 2021, the discovery of al-Qaeda’s leader Ayman al-Zawahiri in Kabul less than a year later, and the increasing threat of the Islamic State of Khorasan (ISIS-K) from Afghanistan. However, owing to the escalating pressures of strategic competition with China and Russia, counterterrorism has significantly dropped in importance in the policy agenda.

Type: Report

Violent Extremism

Why Counterterrorism in Afghanistan and Pakistan Still Matters

Why Counterterrorism in Afghanistan and Pakistan Still Matters

Thursday, May 9, 2024

From wars in Ukraine and the Middle East to rising tensions in the South China Sea, there is no shortage of crises to occupy the time and attention of U.S. policymakers. But three years after the U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan, the threat of terrorism emanating from South Asia remains strong and policymakers need to be more vigilant. Indeed, at the end of March, an Afghanistan-based affiliate of ISIS launched a devastating attack outside of Moscow, killing over 140 people.

Type: Question and Answer

Global PolicyViolent Extremism

As Fragile Kashmir Cease-Fire Turns Three, Here’s How to Keep it Alive

As Fragile Kashmir Cease-Fire Turns Three, Here’s How to Keep it Alive

Wednesday, February 21, 2024

At midnight on the night of February 24-25, 2021, India and Pakistan reinstated a cease-fire that covered their security forces operating “along the Line of Control (LOC) and all other sectors” in Kashmir, the disputed territory that has been at the center of the India-Pakistan conflict since 1947. While the third anniversary of that agreement is a notable landmark in the history of India-Pakistan cease-fires, the 2021 cease-fire is fragile and needs bolstering to be maintained.

Type: Analysis

Global Policy

Understanding Pakistan’s Election Results

Understanding Pakistan’s Election Results

Tuesday, February 13, 2024

Days after Pakistan’s February 8 general election, the Election Commission of Pakistan released the official results confirming a major political upset. Contrary to what most political pundits and observers had predicted, independents aligned with former Prime Minister Imran Khan’s Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) won the most seats at the national level, followed by former Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif’s Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N), the Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) and the Muttahida Qaumi Movement (MQM). No party won an absolute majority needed to form a government on its own. The resultant uncertainty means the United States may have to contend with a government that is more focused on navigating internal politics and less so on addressing strategic challenges.

Type: Analysis

Global Elections & ConflictGlobal Policy

View All Publications